🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond who would win citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in the city, has spent more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

I had to do that since they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the system every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of ballots that came in after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible in which election day turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which the opponent was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner added 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse, youthful, tenants and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year backed Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to surpass 50%. He has just over 50% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think probable, and I hope he does so then no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added many conservatives on Staten Island who had a high participation. I believe there was a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those parts of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for the independent. Thus there was some opposition. However overall, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election we reported on if the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential there. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from progressives hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I think that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.